Through my own experience as a teacher, and as
a teacher that entered the profession through New Jersey’s Alternate Route, I
can say with the utmost confidence that there is absolutely no benefit derived
by high school teachers that followed the traditional route of receiving a
degree in education. This position was further reinforced by my son’s
experience in high school. My son is now a freshmen studying aerospace
engineering at the University of Maryland, and I can tell you unequivocally
that his best teachers all entered teaching through the alternate route, all
having spent time in the private sector prior to teaching.
These anecdotal experiences
have been confirmed by a host of recent studies indicating that teachers with
greater knowledge of their subject matter are best able to create passion and
deeper knowledge of the subject for their students, that they exude greater confidence
in the classroom, and are able to set higher expectations for their students as
well. This of course does not mean that we can simply “dump” these subject
matter “experts” into the classroom and expect them to perform. In fact the
alternate route program includes a rigorous program of supervision in concert with
college coursework taken at night as a requirement for completing the program.
What I propose- Senators Ruiz
and Turner are you listening!!- is legislation to encourage students graduating
with degrees in fields other than education to become high school teachers. For
those looking to work in elementary or middle school, the program will focus on
teachers that earn dual majors in their content area and early childhood
education. Specifically, each college graduate will receive $5000 a year
towards repayment of their student loans as long as they receive satisfactory
performance reviews. This program will continue for the four years leading up
to tenure. For those professionals that enter teaching from the private sector,
they should earn a year on the salary guide for every year they have worked in
the private sector.
Like all legislation
reflecting public policy, there is some element of discrimination,
subjectivity, and choice. In this case the legislation is designed not to hurt
those that pursue degrees in education, but rather to reward those that choose
to enter the classroom rather than become engineers, scientists, accountants,
computer programmers, economists, statisticians, or any other number of professions,
or who choose to give up those professions to enter the rewarding world of
teaching.
I will admit that this
proposal aligns with my own philosophy towards teaching, that being a belief
that teachers should be viewed as entrepreneurs, with their classroom in
essence their product. Having content specialists is an integral part of this
philosophy. The next step is to dial back the core content requirements in each
subject area, thereby liberating these teachers to design unique courses that
reflect their personal passions and expertise. Taken together, these policies
will lead to a more dynamic, rigorous, and exciting school with a culture of
learning guided by entrepreneurial educators motivated to create the most
exciting class the school has to offer.
So let us continue this love
fest with teachers, but let’s not lose sight of the need to hire an entirely
new breed of educator, driven by the passion and knowledge of their subject and
prepared to empower students to take ownership of their learning, guided by
educators who have been given the freedom to design their own innovative and
challenging curricula. As a student, that’s the kind of school I would look
forward to attending when I got up each morning.
No comments:
Post a Comment